1. Do you have an old account but can't access it?


    See Accessing your GIRS Account or Contact Us - We are here to help!

Refugium Setup Ideas

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Pete H., Jul 6, 2012.

  1. Pete H.

    Pete H. Well-Known ReefKeeper

    853
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    So, I have a 30 gallon tank that is partitioned off. The first partition has the water come into the tank. Then there is about 20 gallons worth of water for a refugium for my 130 gallon tank. I was trying to decide how to stock my refugium to best take care of my tank. I am planning on several herbivores in the tank, so I was thinking a few different types of macro algae that the tangs and such would like to eat. I was also thinking of putting a deep sand bed and several pieces of rock rubble in the tank with maybe a few snails. However, it was also recommended I go bare bottom with only some macro for easy maintenance. I was wondering what people recommended and what has worked really well for them. The tank is in the stand, so, mangroves would be out of the question. lol.
    Thanks for the advice!
     
  2. adampottebaum

    adampottebaum Experienced Reefkeeper

    Ratings:
    +19 / 0 / -0
    More than one macro algae in one system will actually produce less growth. They release chemicals that inhibit growth in each other, as well as some people believing they affect coral growth. Keep it simple and easiest to manage, over complicating things usually leads to people to not spending time keeping up on maintenance due to more work.
     
  3. MXC207 Well-Known ReefKeeper

    634
    Cedar Rapids
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0 / -0
    +1. I'd stick to small pieces of live rock in the sump, with one type of macro. Live rock is the best source of filtration IMO. Keep it simple.
     
  4. Pete H.

    Pete H. Well-Known ReefKeeper

    853
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Ok. So, live rock rubble with macro. (is cheato a good one? Is another better for growing for tangs and such?) do people recommend a deep sand bed? Or bare bottom?
     
  5. MXC207 Well-Known ReefKeeper

    634
    Cedar Rapids
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0 / -0
    Personally, I'm not a fan of bare bottoms. I think sand bottoms look better, more natural, and if a rock falls over, you dont have to worry about the bottom of your tank cracking. Sand looks good and plays as insurance in a way. I've seen alot of people run chaeto, but personally I have never really ran anything macro wise, so hopefully someone else will chip in on that. I'd actually be curious what others have used for feeding tangs and such as well.
     
  6. adampottebaum

    adampottebaum Experienced Reefkeeper

    Ratings:
    +19 / 0 / -0



    I think he's talking about sand or bate bottom in the sump. I wouldn't bother with sand I'd you have it in your display. People grow ulva or gracilaria for tang food.
     
  7. rbp4135

    rbp4135 Inactive User

    131
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I would run the sump bare-bottom and elevate the rock off the bottom a bit, if possible. Having the rock elevated would help prevent detritus from settling in your sump. If you wanted a DSB i would look at running externally so when it becomes saturated with nutrients (insert debate here about how fast/if this actually happens) the sand can be easily replaced. As for the macro I have used Chateao in the past but didn't observe any changes in nutrient levels from adding it into my system (Nitrate & Phos) was what I was hoping to decrease. I would run it on an opposite photocycle to your display tank. In my newest set up I am looking at running a biopellet reactor with the output dumping to my skimmer to assist in nutrient export.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.